matt ryall’s weblog

Talking tech since 2002.

Site

Portrait of Matt Ryall

 

About me

Feed icon Articles feed

Feed icon Comments feed

Archive

Photography

Europe trip 2004

More photos

Software

NoteWiki

Other Pages

About Me

Uni timetable

SysProg Journal

The List

Starbucks in Australia

2 August 2008

This week, Starbucks closed the majority of its Australian stores. Included in the 685 staff who were dismissed, one of my friends lost his job—his first full-time position since he moved to Australia.

Wei is certainly going to move on to an even better job, and probably one more in line with what he has been studying, so I’m not too worried for him. I am a bit concerned that it took Starbucks this long to realise that their Australian strategy isn’t working though. The first Australian Starbucks café opened in Sydney in July 2000—more than eight years ago.

On the weekend of the ICFP programming contest, I took the opportunity while most of the cafés in the city were closed to taste-test the two coffee chains which have outlets on my way to the office: Gloria Jeans and Starbucks.

Unfortunately, I was quite disappointed. I ordered a small flat white at both places, and the prices at $3.40 were a full 40-50% more than I would pay at one of the coffee shops around the office that are open on weekdays. Expensive coffee was kind of what I expected. But what was completely unexpected was the Starbucks barrista making my flat white with a shot of coffee, half a cup of milk, and half a cup of hot water!

Wei tells me that this is American-style coffee, and what people want when they come to a Starbucks café. Perhaps the franchise way of producing the same coffee everywhere worked for a while for Starbucks, but I have a feeling this is part of the reason their stores haven’t been a huge success in Australia.

Starbucks in Australia have been making coffee that is different to what many first-time customers expect, charging more than other cafés in the area, incurring high expenses from prime real estate and large numbers of staff (it seems like typically three people are behind the counter to take the order and make the coffee). It definitely seems like it was time for them to reevaluate their approach to the Australian coffee market.

 
Posted by Charles Miller at 2008-08-02 23:03:27
There was a great article on the subject of Starbucks in Crikey last week. I’ll see if I can have it emailed to you
 
Posted by Matt Ryall at 2008-08-03 00:26:34
Thanks for the article. For everyone else, it is online here:

http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20080730-Starbucks.html

It’s funny and well written. Rob seems to have come to same conclusion as me:

“Starbucks is struggling in Australia because it deserves to struggle.

“Australians have long known that great coffee and compelling cafĂ© experiences are everywhere. Starbucks tried to impose their US version of coffee on us. Anyone confronted with a vase-sized container of watery coffee when they ordered a strong latte soon learnt what Starbucks could not, or would not, offer.”
 
Posted by Jeff L at 2008-08-03 01:09:42
Yeah, shot of Espresso + Water is actually known as an “Americano” over here. So, so sad.

OTOH, if I’m remembering my Aussie coffee drink names correctly, what you call a Flat White we call a “no foam Latte”, which would be Espresso + steamed milk. No water. So it’s sort of a bastardize American coffee, at best.

Among those of Yanks who like coffee, Starbucks in the US gets low marks for over roasting their beans, to the point of tasting burnt. Do that do that down there, too?
 
Posted by Charles Miller at 2008-08-03 07:50:14
Ah, I didn’t know the article was public. Most Crikey articles are behind their pay-wall which is why I emailed it instead.
 
Posted by Tom Davies at 2008-08-03 09:17:45
Unlike Gloria Jeans, Starbucks isn’t franchised. This means that Starbucks is subject to payroll tax, while Gloria jeans is not (because each business falls below the threshold)
 

Comments on this article have been closed.